Background
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition that affects individuals across the lifespan and is increasingly recognised as a significant public health priority. Medication is a key component of evidence-based ADHD treatment, yet decisions around starting, adjusting, or continuing medication remain challenging for many patients, families, and clinicians. These decisions often involve balancing perceived benefits with concerns about side effects, stigma, long-term impact, and personal beliefs about medication. Despite national guidance emphasising the importance of shared decision-making (SDM), research consistently shows that patients do not always feel involved in discussions, and clinicians may underestimate the values and preferences that shape how individuals experience ADHD and its treatment.
Aims
This PhD project will investigate how well current prescribing practice aligns with what patients and families actually value when making decisions about ADHD medication. It will explore the extent to which SDM is implemented in real-world settings, identify gaps between patient expectations and clinician assumptions, and examine how these discrepancies may influence treatment outcomes, adherence, and satisfaction with care.
Methods
Using a mixed-methods approach—including systematic reviews, qualitative interviews/focus-groups, and survey or choice-based methodologies—the project will generate an in-depth understanding of the factors shaping medication decisions across diverse groups.
Significance
By identifying mismatches between what matters to patients and what drives prescribing decisions, the project aims to inform the development of more person-centred, equitable models of ADHD care. The findings will provide actionable recommendations for clinicians, policymakers, and service providers seeking to improve communication, support informed choice, and enhance long-term engagement with treatment. This PhD offers an opportunity to contribute to a growing area of research with meaningful implications for practice, ensuring that medication decisions for ADHD are truly collaborative and reflective of patient priorities.
Primary Supervisor’s key papers in this area:
• Khan MU*, Hasan SS. Socioeconomic status and prescribing of ADHD medications: a study of ICB-level data in England. BMJ Mental Health. 2025 Mar 11;28(1).
• Khan MU*, Hasan SS. Phase-specific strategies and interventions to enhance medication adherence across different phases in ADHD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2024 Jun 9:1-2.
• Khan MU*, Balbontin C, Bliemer M, Aslani P. Using discrete choice experiment to investigate patients’ and parents’ preferences for initiating ADHD medication. Journal of Mental Health. 2023 Mar 4;32(2):373-85.
• Khan MU*, Balbontin C, Bliemer MC, Aslani P. Eliciting preferences for continuing medication among adult patients and parents of children with attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder. Health Expectations. 2022 Jun;25(3):1094-107.
• Hasan SS, Bal N, Baker I, Kow CS, Khan MU. Adverse drug reaction reporting and prescribing trends of drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in primary care England, 2010–2019. Journal of attention disorders. 2022 Feb;26(3):467-75.
• Khan MU*, Aslani P. Exploring factors influencing initiation, implementation and discontinuation of medications in adults with ADHD. Health Expectations. 2021 May;24:82-94.